Ambiguity aversion and the degree of ambiguity
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract We empirically show that sample information not only moderates prospects’ outcome ambiguity but also decision makers’ revealed aversion of them. Since most natural prospects permit at least some inference, accounting for their degree improves prediction aversion. The special case full ambiguity, as in Ellsberg-type designs, is typically averted—yet many makers systematically like low degrees while disliking higher degrees. Ambiguity attitudes might thus usefully be characterized by sensitivity to such thresholds. Just people risks others, they have depend on how much there is. towards a are systematic, enabling across sources ambiguity.
منابع مشابه
Ambiguity and Ambiguity Aversion
Consider the following choice problem, known as “Ellsberg’s three-color urn example”, or simply the “Ellsberg Paradox” (Ellsberg [7]). An urn contains 30 red balls, and 60 green and blue balls, in unspecified proportions; subjects are asked to compare (i) a bet on a red draw vs. a bet on a green draw, and (ii) a bet on a red or blue draw vs. a bet on a green or blue draw. If the subject wins a ...
متن کاملDecreasing aversion under ambiguity
Under which condition does the set of desirable uncertain prospects expand when wealth increases? We show that the decreasing concavity (DC) of the utility function is necessary and sufficient in the −maxmin expected utility model. In the smooth ambiguity aversion model with the ambiguity valuation function , the DC of and of ◦ is necessary and sufficient. An alternative definition of d...
متن کاملMeasuring Ambiguity Aversion
Loss Set A Set A Set A Set A Investment Set B Set B Set B Set B Insurance Set B Set B Set B Set B Furthermore, the subjects face four different types of information in both decision frames and treatments. The ‘precise’ information frame has exact probabilities and exact payments stated. In the ‘ambiguity in probability’ frames, the probability is stated as a range and the payment is fixed. Conv...
متن کاملHypothesis Testing and Ambiguity Aversion∗
We study a model of non-Bayesian updating, based on the Hypothesis Testing model of Ortoleva (2012), for ambiguity averse agents. Agents ranks acts following the MaxMin Expected Utility model of Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989) and when they receive new information they update their set of priors as follows: If the information is such that all priors in the original set of priors assign to it a pro...
متن کاملAmbiguity Aversion and Auction Theory
This paper considers when the utility function of the bidders is ambiguity averse, how does the bidding strategy differ in four classical auction mechanisms. In particular, if there is no information affiliation, i.e., when first order sealed auction is equivalent to English auction in terms of bidding, bidders may bid higher or lower relative to ambiguity neutral case. From the seller’s point ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['0895-5646', '1573-0476']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-023-09410-6